I bet a few companies are not too happy about what Turing Pharmaceuticals just did.
Turing acquired rights to the drug Daraprim and pretty much right away increased its price from $13.50 a tablet to $750. The NYT has the story.
Well, that created quite an uproar. Hillary Clinton tweeted, "Price gouging like this in the specialty drug market is outrageous. Tomorrow I'll lay out a plan to take it on. -H"
Today the biotech sector had a bad day on Wall Street.
Hmmm......
Now what was Turing up to? Maybe the previous owner, Impax Laboratories, was simply mispricing it? Maybe there is a difference in opinion as to the price elasticity of demand?
Or maybe there is a difference in time horizon/discount rate between the old owner and the new owner, with the new owner caring more about cash in the present than a lower but longer annuity?
3 comments:
There is more discussion about Turing at Inthepipline.
http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2015/09/23/shkreli-turing-and-phrma
My opinion is that the new owner may have simply made a colossal PR and business blunder, which the free market should allow for. I have not kept up with all of the updates to the story, but I believe a competitor promptly swooped in and offered a generic at a vastly lower price. Thus, it would appear that the market cleanly solved for this, not handwringing.
Great Article. thanks for sharing!
همراه وب | طراحی سایت | طراحی گرافیک سایت | طراحی قالب وردپرس | اخذ اقامت ترکیه | اجاره ملک در ترکیه | خرید ملک در ترکیه | ثبت شرکت در ترکیه | سرمایه گذاری در ترکیه
Post a Comment